“I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that saving pdf files World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade [Center] 1 and 2 got hit by planes—7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.” (Rosie O'Donnell, March 29, 2007) Paging Rosie O'Donnell. [silence] Paging Rosie O'Donnell. Ah, Ms. O'Donnell, there you are. By now you've had a chance to read the Popular Mechanics article that debunked your insinuation that the collapse of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 was caused by something other than the collision of two jet planes into the towers. We're still waiting for you to explain to us why Popular Mechanics is wrong, Ms. O'Donnell. Being intellectually honest, as I'm sure you are, you're probably lying awake nights wondering where your engineering analysis of the collapse of the World Trade Center went wrong. But meanwhile -- did you hear about the fiery crash Sunday at the interchange near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge that burned so hot it caused the highway to collapse? OAKLAND, Calif. - A gasoline tanker crashed and burst into flames near the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge on Sunday, creating such intense heat that a stretch of highway melted and collapsed.

Click Here

Click Here

Today is the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Gonzales v. Raich , which upheld the federal government's software development process power to regulate medical marijuana under the Commerce Clause. This blog has been doing a series of posts on the downstream effects of and broader issues raised by Raich , which are collected here: Gonzales v. Raich One Year Later: The Big Story Is What Hasn't Happened Gonzales v. Raich One year later: The Argument in Raich is Far From Finished Gonzales v. Raich One Year Later: The Statutory Possibilities Gonzales v. Raich One Year Later: Federalism Only When It's Convenient

Click Here

Imagine if you had a really amazing, complex and intriguing personal story--this one, happens to concern your medical state--and you were a writer who had found ways to turn it into at least three distinct stories (for now), to write these stories, and then to find out that they're appreciated by those who commissioned them but sitting on someone's hard drive for an undisclosed amount of time because, well, the magazine business is pretty shitty for most people involved--at home on their computers, writing the stories, and in the magazine's offices, editing the stories--what would you do? Would you want to publish these stories on your blog? Especially now that your blog won a lot of attention from a positive blurb on Typepad's homepage ? Or would you be patient--and ethical, obviously--and hope that one of the mags will slot you in along with that Justin Timberlake interview sooner michigan international speedway than you, well, um... Let's just leave it at that. I supposed I should explain that yes, these stories don't just deal with health, but with a very trying and serious medical situation that has become chronic and weird and multi-faceted and way more bizarre and scary for all involved (me and doctors) than cancer. Cancer, in fact, is sort of simple compared to all of this.